WANNAMAKER v. BROWN

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

6526

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Barron Ray and D.C. Ray, for appellant, cite: 18 S.C. 204; 27 S.C. 197; 31 S.C. 565; 2 Pom. Eq. Rem., sec. 835; 6 Pom. Eq. Jur., sec. 835; 18 N.J. Eq., 124-128; 44 Ill., 299; 23 Pac., 695; 26 N.J. Eq., 330; 73 Pa. St., 485; 41 Ohio St., 636; 56 N.Y., 12; 37 Am. St. R., 894; 2 App. D.C., 207; 94 N.C. 304; 98 N.W., 724; Pom. Spec. Perfm., sec. 462; 2 Warvelle on Vend., 769; Waterman Spec. Per., sec 511. Messrs. DePass DePass, contra, cite: Story Eq. Jur., secs. 734, 742; 67 S.C. 216; 69 S.C. 373; 2 Strob., 81; 4 Rich. Law, 516; 5 Rich. L., 374; 27 S.C. 123; 3 C.E. Green., 124; 2 Grant's Case, 103; 12 Mich., 193; 14 Allen, 94, 1; 116 Mass. 90; 4 Rich. L., 374; 4 Mass. 629; 2 N. McC., 186; 3 McC., 449; 9 Rich., 378; 4 Kent. Com. L., 67; Platt on Con. Ch., 2d ed., 4.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

6526

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Barron Ray and D.C. Ray, for appellant, cite: 18 S.C. 204; 27 S.C. 197; 31 S.C. 565; 2 Pom. Eq. Rem., sec. 835; 6 Pom. Eq. Jur., sec. 835; 18 N.J. Eq., 124-128; 44 Ill., 299; 23 Pac., 695; 26 N.J. Eq., 330; 73 Pa. St., 485; 41 Ohio St., 636; 56 N.Y., 12; 37 Am. St. R., 894; 2 App. D.C., 207; 94 N.C. 304; 98 N.W., 724; Pom. Spec. Perfm., sec. 462; 2 Warvelle on Vend., 769; Waterman Spec. Per., sec 511. Messrs. DePass DePass, contra, cite: Story Eq. Jur., secs. 734, 742; 67 S.C. 216; 69 S.C. 373; 2 Strob., 81; 4 Rich. Law, 516; 5 Rich. L., 374; 27 S.C. 123; 3 C.E. Green., 124; 2 Grant's Case, 103; 12 Mich., 193; 14 Allen, 94, 1; 116 Mass. 90; 4 Rich. L., 374; 4 Mass. 629; 2 N. McC., 186; 3 McC., 449; 9 Rich., 378; 4 Kent. Com. L., 67; Platt on Con. Ch., 2d ed., 4.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

WANNAMAKER v. BROWN.

May 1, 1907. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE POPE.

The facts of this case are set out in the decree of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, which is affirmed for the reasons therein stated.

Appeal dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE WOODS did not sit in this case because disqualified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.