MONTAGUE v. HOOD

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

6664

Attorney(S)

Messrs. B.A. Hagood and Huger Sinkler for appellant. Mr. Hagood cites: The mere mention of a fact in casual conversation cannot take the place of notice by record required by statute: Code 1902, 2457; 74 S.C. 372; 57 S.C. 357. Messrs. Raysor Summers, contra, cite: Injunction will not be granted as a means to obtain possession of property: 1 High on Inj., 270, 271; 27 S.C. 408; 54 S.C. 408; 69 S.C. 56; 42 S.C. 144. Contract was binding although only signed by Warly: 1 Chitty's Con., 453. And this contract established relation of landlord and tenant: 54 S.C. 289; 36 S.C. 274; 18 Ency., 606; 19 Mo., 118; 32 Neb. 195; 118 Pa. St., 578. Entry and occupation by defendant constituted acceptance: 77 Col., 286; 147 Pa. St., 501.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

6664

Attorney(S)

Messrs. B.A. Hagood and Huger Sinkler for appellant. Mr. Hagood cites: The mere mention of a fact in casual conversation cannot take the place of notice by record required by statute: Code 1902, 2457; 74 S.C. 372; 57 S.C. 357. Messrs. Raysor Summers, contra, cite: Injunction will not be granted as a means to obtain possession of property: 1 High on Inj., 270, 271; 27 S.C. 408; 54 S.C. 408; 69 S.C. 56; 42 S.C. 144. Contract was binding although only signed by Warly: 1 Chitty's Con., 453. And this contract established relation of landlord and tenant: 54 S.C. 289; 36 S.C. 274; 18 Ency., 606; 19 Mo., 118; 32 Neb. 195; 118 Pa. St., 578. Entry and occupation by defendant constituted acceptance: 77 Col., 286; 147 Pa. St., 501.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

MONTAGUE v. HOOD.

September 24, 1907. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE POPE.

After a careful consideration of the testimony set forth in the record in this case, this Court is satisfied that the decree of the Circuit Judge is correct, and, therefore, adopts it as the opinion of this Court.

It is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

MONTAGUE v. HOOD.

Comments