Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

RUTHERFURD REALTY COMPANY, Respondent, v. WILLET F. COOK, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Per Curiam.

The findings of fact in the decision of the court have been unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.

Such findings do not show that the personal obligation of the defendant Cook was assigned to the plaintiff. The other questions discussed are not raised by such findings. The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless the plaintiff within twenty days consents to amend the judgment, by striking therefrom that part thereof directing that if the proceeds of the sale of the real property therein described be insufficient to pay the amount due to the plaintiff, with interest and costs, that the defendant Cook pay the same to the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff have execution therefor, in which case the judgment as so amended is affirmed, without costs to either party in this court.

CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUTHERFURD REALTY COMPANY v. COOK
(Mar 31, 1908)