AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MAX SCHIMKEVITZ, Respondent, v. THEODORE A. BINGHAM, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and Others, Appellants.

PER CURIAM:

The question presented on this appeal is the same as that presented in the case of Shepard v. Bingham ( 125 App. Div. 784), decided herewith, and for the reasons there stated the order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an injunction denied, with ten dollars costs.

LAUGHLIN, J. (concurring):

I concur in the reversal of the injunction order in this case upon the grounds stated in my concurring memorandum in Eden Musee American Co., Ltd., v. Bingham ( 125 App. Div. 780, 784), argued and decided herewith, which apply to facts here presented.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHIMKEVITZ v. BINGHAM
(May 8, 1908)