Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE ex rel. WEST, Atty. Gen., v. CHESTNUTT et al.

1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — Cities of the First Class — Statehood Changes in Indian Territory. A city of the second class under the laws in force in the Indian Territory prior to the admission of the state having a population of more than 2,500 became upon the admission of the state, by virtue of section 10 of the Schedule to the Constitution (Bunn's Ed. sec. 459), a city of the first class under the laws extended in force in the state.

2. SAME — Subsequent Statutes Not Affecting. The act of the Legislature approved February 20, 1908, (Sess. Laws 1907-08, p. 183, c. 12) entitled "An act amending sections 1, 5, 6, of article 1, chapter 14, of an act providing for the incorporation and government of cities of the first class, of the Statutes of Oklahoma of 1893; amending section 1, of article 1, of chapter 6, of the Session Laws of Oklahoma of 1897, entitled 'An act amending sections 7 and 8 of article 1, chapter 14, of an act entitled "An act providing for the incorporation and government of cities of the first class, Statutes of Oklahoma 1893," ' providing for the incorporation and government of cities of the first class, and declaring an emergency," and the provisions thereof, do not apply to cities that were continued or became by section 10 of the Schedule to the Constitution (Bunn's Ed. sec. 459) cities of the first class under the laws extended in force in the state.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

HAYES, J. (after stating the facts as above).

The questions of law presented in this case are identically the same as those in the case of State of Oklahoma ex rel. Charles J. West, Attorney General, v. J. F. Ledbetter, supra, and the conclusions of the court in that case must follow in this case. It is therefore the judgment of this court that plaintiff have the relief prayed for in its petition.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE EX REL. v. CHESTNUTT ET AL
(Nov 11, 1908)