Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SASS CRAWFORD v. THOMAS.

On authority of Laurel Oil Co. v. Morrison, 212 U.S. 291, writ of error to review a judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in a case coming from the United States court for the Indian Territory dismissed.

The headnote in Laurel Oil Co. v. Morrison is as follows: "Where a statute provides for an appeal or a writ of error to a specific court it must be regarded as a repeal of any previous statute providing for an appeal or a writ of error to another court. Brown v. United States, 171 U.S. 631.
"Decisions of the Court of Appeals of the United States for the Indian Territory are final except as made subject to review by some express statutory provision.
"The provisions in § 12 of the act of March 3, 1905, c. 1479, 33 Stat. 1081, for appeals and writs of error from the United States courts in Indian Territory to the United States Court of Appeals in the Indian Territory, and from that court to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit are exclusive; and there is now no appeal or writ of error in such cases from the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Eighth Circuit to this court."

Per Curiam:

The writ of error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction on authority of Laurel Oil Co. v. Morrison, 212 U.S. 291, decided February 23, 1909.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SASS CRAWFORD v. THOMAS
(Mar 22, 1909)