AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE AETNA INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Corporation, Respondent, v. ALTADENA MINING AND INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, et al., Appellants.

THE COURT. —

This is an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage and is, therefore, a suit in equity. The appeal was properly taken to the supreme court, but was erroneously filed in this court, such error doubtless occurring through the fact that the entitlement of the court on the back of the transcript and briefs is printed as follows: "In the District Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District."

It ought to be pretty well understood by the profession by this time that, under section 4 of article VI of the constitution, this court is without appellate jurisdiction of suits in equity by direct appeal.

The case will have to be transferred to the supreme court, and such is the order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AETNA INDEM. CO. v. ALTADENA MIN. ETC. CO
(Jul 12, 1909)