Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BROOM v. HELMS.

September 27, 1909. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE JONES.

This is an appeal from an order of nonsuit in an action for partition of real estate, wherein an issue of title was raised by defendant's answer, and the trial was had before a jury.

This being an action in equity, the authorities in this State are numerous to the effect that nonsuit is improper. Woolfolk v. Manf'g Co., 22 S.C. 332; McClenaghan v. McEachern, 47 S.C. 446, 25 S.E., 296; Barnes v. Rodgers, 54 S.C. 115, 31 S.E., 885; Gilreath v. Furman, 57 S.C. 289, 35 S.E., 516; Railway v. Beaudrot, 63 S.C. 266, 41 S.E., 299; Garner v. Garner, 72 S.C. 439, 52 S.E., 194.

In this situation it would be improper to consider the correctness of the grounds for the motion.

The order of nonsuit is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

MR. JUSTICE HYDRICK disqualified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BROOM v. HELMS
(Sep 27, 1909)