Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

B. B. BOULDIN v. GARLAND DANIEL.

Discretion of Trial Court — Verdict — Weight of Evidence — Testimony of Witnesses.

Motion for new trial upon affidavit in respect to the testimony of a witness, and for that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence, are matters strictly within the discretion of the lower court.

PER CURIAM:

Upon an examination of the record in this case, the Court is of opinion that the questions involved are entirely questions of fact and that they have been settled by the verdict of the jury.

We find no merit in the assignments of error relating to the evidence and the charge.

The motion of the defendant for a new trial, based upon the defendant's affidavit in respect to the testimony of Vanderford, is a (284) matter strictly within the sound discretion of the judge below. The same is true in regard to a motion for new trial for that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence. Freeman v. Bell, 159 N.C. 146; Benton v. R. R., 122 N.C. 1009.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BOULDIN v. DANIEL
(Nov 1, 1909)