Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MORRIS EMERSON v. THE STATE.

Burglary — Practice on Appeal.

The Court of Criminal Appeals will not reverse a case where there is no statement of facts if the court's charge, given and criticised, could be applicable to any state of facts that might be introduced under the allegations in the indictment.

DAVIDSON, PRESIDING JUDGE.

This conviction was for burglary, the punishment being assessed at five years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The questions mentioned in motion for new trial can not be revised in the absence of the evidence. The charge given is applicable to a state of facts provable under the allegations in the indictment. This court will not reverse a case where the statement of facts is not before us, if the charge given and criticised could be applicable to any state of facts that might be introduced under the allegations in the indictment. As the record is presented to us we find no error.

The judgment, therefore, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EMERSON v. THE STATE
(Jan 19, 1910)