Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGE RUSSELL v. THE STATE.

Burglary — Statement of Facts — Bill of Exceptions — Practice on Appeal.

Where upon appeal from a conviction of burglary the statement of facts and bills of exception were filed too late in the court below the same could not be considered; and the indictment being sufficient the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

RAMSEY, JUDGE.

From a judgment of conviction on a charge of burglary had in the District Court of Montague County, on July 27 of this year, appellant appeals to this court, and seeks a reversal of such judgment of conviction.

It appears from the record that the term of court at which appellant suffered conviction adjourned on August 20, 1909. Both the statement of facts and bills of exception were filed, as same appears from the record, on November 15, 1909. We are not authorized, therefore, to consider either the statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment being good, it follows, in this state of the record, that the judgment of conviction must be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUSSELL v. THE STATE
(Feb 2, 1910)