Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

J.S. PHELPS v. THE STATE.

Local Option — Felony — Statutes Construed.

The felony provision, of the Act of the Thirty-first Legislature, has no application to the sale of intoxicating liquors in counties which had adopted local option before the passage of said Act. Following Lewis v. State, 58 Tex. Crim. 351.

RAMSEY, JUDGE.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Hill County on the 14th day of December, 1909, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of law, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of one year.

There are a number of questions raised both by motion for new trial and bills of exception, which we deem unnecessary to set out. The holding of the court in the case of Lewis v. State, decided at the present term, to the effect, in substance, that the felony provision of the statute of the last Legislature has no application to sales in counties which had adopted local option before the passage of the Act in question, must dispose of the appeal adversely to the State.

For the reasons given in the Lewis case, the judgment of conviction is reversed and the cause is remanded with instructions to the District Court to transfer the case to the County Court of Hill County.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PHELPS v. THE STATE
(Mar 16, 1910)