Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROGERS v. CLARK IRON COMPANY.

Where the state court only decides who is entitled to lands under a patent no Federal question is necessarily involved and this court does not have jurisdiction to review under § 709, Rev. Stat., and in this case no Federal question was decided directly or by implication. An attempt to raise a Federal question in this court for the first time is too late. 104 Minn. 198, affirmed.

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The case is reported below in 104 Minn. 198, where the facts are set forth at length. We hold that no Federal question was decided either in express terms or by necessary implication, and that the attempt to raise a Federal question was made in this court for the first time, which was too late.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROGERS v. CLARK IRON CO
(Apr 11, 1910)