Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOSEPH SALZMAN, Appellant, v. MAX KONIG, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Defendant moved at the opening of the trial to dismiss the complaint, upon the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court thereupon suspended the trial and stated that, in the event of a denial of the motion, he would set the cause down for a future day for trial. Subsequently he granted the motion and dismissed the complaint, with costs. This was error. The motion should have been treated as a demurrer and leave given to the plaintiff to amend his complaint. Rogers v. Fine, 49 Misc. 633; Carpenter v. Pirner, 52 id. 485.

The judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Present: SEABURY, GUY and BIJUR, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SALZMAN v. KONIG
(May 1, 1910)