AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHAEL J. COHALAN, as Recei v. r in Proceedings Supplementary to Execution, etc., of CLIFFORD E. PARKER, a Judgment Debtor, and Others, Respondents,

MILLER, J.:

The judgment appealed from directs the sale of the appellant's interest in and to the estate of Ransom Parker, deceased, to satisfy two judgments. The interest directed to be sold is the judgment debtor's interest in and to the remainder of two separate trusts created by the testator. The appellant contends that one of the remainders is contingent and therefore, not the subject of sale. We are cited to no statute or rule of law which prevents the sale of a remainder interest, whether vested or contingent, and the statute expressly provides that an expectant estate is descendible, devisable and alienable in the same manner as an estate in possession. (Real Prop. Law [Consol. Laws, chap. 50; Laws of 1909, chap. 52], § 59.) It is unnecessary, therefore, to pass upon the question argued by the appellant. Whatever interest the judgment debtor has will be acquired by the purchaser at the sale. That may be an expectancy which will never ripen into an estate in possession.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

INGRAHAM, P.J., McLAUGHLIN, LAUGHLIN and DOWLING, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COHALAN v. PARKER
(Jun 3, 1910)