Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH BESCH, Respondent, for the Examination of Witnesses in an Expected Action. HORATIO M. POLLOCK, Appellant.

While we are of the opinion that the order sought to be reviewed was made without authority, we are also of the opinion that it is not a final order in a special proceeding and subject to appeal to this court, but that its validity may be tested by the appellant when any attempt is made to punish him for failing to comply with the order. ( Matter of Strong v. Randall, 177 N.Y. 400.) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed, but, under the circumstances, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., VANN, WERNER, HISCOCK and COLLIN, JJ.; HAIGHT, J., concurs only in the dismissal of the appeal. Absent: GRAY, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BESCH
(May 9, 1911)