CUTTEN v. McCARTHY

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

S.F. No. 5511, S.F. No. 5512, S.F. No. 5513.

Attorney(S)

Barclay Henley, and Arthur H. Barendt, in pro. per., for Appellant, Frank J. Murphy, for Respondent, John S. Martin. Cleveland L. Dam, George Appell, and A.L. O'Grady, for Respondents, P.H. McCarthy and Arthur M. Sharp. Percy V. Long, City Attorney, and F.J. English, Assistant City Attorney, Amici Curiæ, on petition for rehearing.

Judges

M. C. Sloss

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

S.F. No. 5511, S.F. No. 5512, S.F. No. 5513.

Attorney(S)

Barclay Henley, and Arthur H. Barendt, in pro. per., for Appellant, Frank J. Murphy, for Respondent, John S. Martin. Cleveland L. Dam, George Appell, and A.L. O'Grady, for Respondents, P.H. McCarthy and Arthur M. Sharp. Percy V. Long, City Attorney, and F.J. English, Assistant City Attorney, Amici Curiæ, on petition for rehearing.

Judges

M. C. Sloss

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

JOSEPH E. CUTTEN, Appellant, v. P.H. McCARTHY, Mayor, etc. et al.,Respondents.GEORGE B. SOMERS, Appellant,

THE COURT.

These cases being exactly similar in all particulars to Barendt v. McCarthy, S.F. No. 5507, ante, p. 680, in which the opinion was filed this day, the judgment of the lower court in each of them is, upon authority of that case, affirmed.

SLOSS, J., dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Barendt v. McCarthy, this day filed.

Beatty, C.J., and Angellotti, J., concurred.

Rehearing in each denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

JOSEPH E. CUTTEN, Appellant, v. P.H. McCARTHY, Mayor, etc. et al.,Respondents.GEORGE B. SOMERS, Appellant,

Comments