AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

WILLIAM S. ANDERSON et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ. Not sitting: GRAY, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ANDERSON v. NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY
(Oct 31, 1911)