Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BANK OF TAFT v. THOMPSON et al.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Briefs. Dismissed for failure to file briefs within the time limited by rule 7 of the Supreme Court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi).

(Syllabus by the Court.)

KANE, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon motion of the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the plaintiff in error has failed to observe rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) in not filing briefs within the required time. An examination of the record shows that the plaintiff in error is in default in regard to filing briefs, although the time for doing so has expired.

The motion to dismiss must be sustained.

TURNER, C. J., and DUNN and HAYES, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BANK OF TAFT v. THOMPSON ET AL
(Nov 14, 1911)