AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent. (Actions Nos. 1, 2.)

Judgment in each action affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, WERNER and COLLIN, JJ. VANN and CHASE, JJ., concur on the ground that the ordinance is unreasonable. Not sitting: GRAY, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THE CITY OF NEW YORK v. NEW YORK CITY RAILWAY COMPANY
(Nov 21, 1911)