Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ATCHISON, T. S. F. RY. CO. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION et al.

RAILROAD CROSSINGS. Syllabus same as in the case of St. Louis San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Love, et al., ante, 118 P. 259.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

DUNN, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court, in which its jurisdiction is invoked, under the provisions of section 20 of article 9 of the Constitution, to prohibit the enforcement of two orders of the Corporation Commission of the state against the plaintiff, the Atchison, Topeka Santa Fe Railway Company. The same questions are raised and the same propositions and principles of law are presented in this case as in the case of St. Louis San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Love et al., ante, 118 P. 259, an opinion decided at this term of court. It therefore follows that the same judgment will be entered, and the writ of prohibition prayed for will be granted. Upon the promulgation of this opinion, notice thereof shall be given the Corporation Commission, and the writ itself shall not issue, except upon a further application and a showing of necessity therefor.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ATCHISON T. S. F. RY. CO. v. CORP. COMMISSION
(Sep 26, 1911)