Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the Application of HENRY A. HINMAN, Appellant, for the Removal of VENA M. HINMAN, Respondent, as Administratrix of the Estate of CHARLES N. HINMAN, Deceased.

Per Curiam.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, solely upon the ground that there was evidence sufficient to authorize the finding that there was a common-law marriage between the administratrix and decedent prior to January 1st, 1902, the date on which chapter 339 of the Laws of 1901 took effect; and also that such evidence was sufficient to raise a presumption of a ceremonial marriage prior to that date. The conclusion of the Appellate Division, that chapter 742 of the Laws of 1907 has now made common-law marriages valid in this state, has not been considered or determined by us.

CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, HISCOCK and COLLIN, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF HINMAN
(Jun 21, 1912)