AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN M. REINER, Respondent, v. HARRY H. GALINGER, Appellant.

MILLER, J.:

The action is brought to have a past due note adjudged to be usurious, illegal and void. The mere fact that one has a defense to an action at law, if one should be brought, has never yet been held to justify an appeal to the jurisdiction of equity. The objection is not merely that there is an adequate remedy at law, but that there is no cause of action.

Section 373 of the General Business Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 20; Laws of 1909, chap. 25), derived from section 5 of title 3 of chapter 4 of part 2 of the Revised Statutes (1 R.S. 772) and chapter 430 of the Laws of 1837, might upon a superficial reading seem to support the plaintiff's right to maintain a suit to have the note adjudged to be void, but the law is settled in this State to the contrary. ( Minturn v. Farmers' Loan Trust Co., 3 N.Y. 498; Allerton v. Belden, 49 id. 373.)

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

INGRAHAM, P.J., McLAUGHLIN, SCOTT and DOWLING, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REINER v. GALINGER
(Jun 28, 1912)