Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROY BOLT v. THE STATE.

Threatening Life of Another — Insufficiency of Evidence.

A rash, inconsiderate expression, provoked by an angry altercation in which the parties were then engaged, does not constitute the offense of seriously threatening the life of a human being. Following March v. State, 3 Texas Crim. App., 107.

HARPER, JUDGE.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of "unlawfully and seriously threatening to take the life of a human being, viz., Grover Rayburn."

The testimony shows beyond a doubt that appellant made an unlawful and unjustifiable assault on Rayburn, but wholly fails to show a violation of article 962 of the Criminal Code. It has been held by this court that a rash, inconsiderate expression, provoked by an angry altercation in which the parties were then engaged, will not constitute the offense. (March v. State, 3 Texas Crim. App., 107.) The most the testimony shows is that appellant perhaps made an unprovoked assault, and when prevented from again striking Rayburn, made an inconsiderate and harsh remark.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BOLT v. THE STATE
(Oct 16, 1912)