Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAMS v. HAYCRAFT

APPEAL AND ERROR — Briefs — Sufficiency. Where plaintiff in error fails to comply with the rules of this court in the preparation of his brief, the proceeding in error will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

TURNER, C. J.

On June 7, 1909, W. T. Haycraft, defendant in error, sued Isham Williams, plaintiff in error, in the district court of Choctaw county in damages for slander. After answer filed, there was trial to a jury and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings the case here.

For the reason that plaintiff in error has failed in his three-page brief to comply with any of the rules of this court, and nowhere in his brief has raised a question of law, this proceeding is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLIAMS v. HAYCRAFT
(Oct 22, 1912)