Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

HUESTESS v. SOUTH ATLANTIC INSURANCE CO.

November 6, 1912. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY.

There was a former appeal in this case which is reported in 88 S.C. 31, 70 S.E. 403. This Court granted a new trial. Thereafter the defendant amended its answer, by order of the Circuit Court. On the second trial in the Circuit Court, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, and the defendant appealed upon numerous exceptions. A statement of the facts appears in the opinion rendered by the Court, on the former hearing.

The rulings of this Court on the former hearing, dispose of all the questions raised by the present appeal.

The argument of the appellants' attorneys, is practically a review of those rulings. But they are not reviewable, as they are res adjudicata. Jones v. Ry., 65 S.C. 410, 43 S.E. 884; Brown v. Tel. Co., 92 S.C. 354.

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE WOODS dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEUSTESS v. INSURANCE CO
(Nov 6, 1912)