Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

C. T. PEELE v. I. G. POWELL, ADMINISTRATRIX.

Evidence — Questions for Jury.

Upon a rehearing of this case it is held that the rules of law heretofore laid down are correct; but upon reconsidering the facts, the majority of the Court hold the evidence sufficient to be submitted to the jury.

BROWN and ALLEN, JJ., dissenting.

CLARK, C. J.

This is a petition to rehear. There is no division in the Court as to the propositions of law laid down on the former hearing; but upon a fuller consideration of the facts, the majority of the Court are now of opinion that there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to a jury.

Petition allowed.

(51)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEELE v. POWELL
(Dec 1, 1912)