Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROBERTS v. CONVERSE et al.

JUSTICES OF THE PEACE — Appeal Bond — Right to Amend. Where a bond given on appeal from justice court is correct in every respect, except that the statutory words "to prosecute without delay" are omitted from the condition, it is error to refuse leave to correct the error by filing a new bond conditioned as required by law.

(Syllabus by Rosser, C.)

Opinion by ROSSER, C.

This appeal is from an order of the county court dismissing an appeal for the reason that the appeal bond was defective.

The facts of this case are almost identical with the facts in the case of Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Roff, 34 Okla. 309, 125 P. 727. It was held that it was the duty of the court to permit an appeal bond to be corrected or amended, as provided in section 6394, Comp. Laws 1909. The decision in that case is controlling in the present case, and has been followed in a number of other cases in this court. See C., R.I. P. Ry. Co. v. Moore, 34 Okla. 199, 124 P. 989; Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Witter, 34 Okla. 313, 125 P. 729.

Upon the authority of those cases, this case must be reversed and remanded, with instructions to the county court of Roger Mills county to permit the plaintiff in error to file an amended appeal bond and to proceed with the trial of the case in regular course.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROBERTS v. CONVERSE ET AL
(Apr 4, 1913)