Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

ATKINSON v. SOUTHERN EXPRESS CO.

May 14, 1913. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY.

The facts in this case are in all respects similar to those in the case of W.W. Atkinson v. Southern Express Company (in which the opinion has just been filed) except that in the present case, the action arose in Kershaw county, where, under the local option laws, the sale of liquor is prohibited, while the other case arose in Richland county, where the sale of liquor is not prohibited.

Under the principles announced in the opinion, which has just been filed, this defense is immaterial.

It is the judgment of this Court that the petitioner is entitled to the order of injunction for which he prays.

MR. JUSTICE FRASER dissents for reasons expressed in opinion in previous case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ATKINSON v. EXPRESS COMPANY
(May 14, 1913)