Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

W. R. HOPKINS ET AL. v. J. M. CRISP ET AL.

Evidence — Issues of Fact — Questions for Jury.

This cause presenting a controversy of fact properly presented to the jury, no error is found.

(1) "Is the land claimed by plaintiffs, Tract No. 1949, located as shown on the plat, and as contended by plaintiffs? Answer: Yes.

From the judgment rendered, defendant appealed.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record in this case and considered the several assignments of error, and we find no reversible error. The controversy appears to be almost exclusively one of fact, and we think the court properly presented it to the jury.

No error.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOPKINS v. CRISP
(May 1, 1913)