Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JULIUS HAAKENSEN v. BURGESS SULPHITE FIBRE CO.

YOUNG, J.

It was held when this case was here before (Haakensen v. Company, 76 N.H. 443) that there was evidence for the jury; and as there is now more evidence for the plaintiff, the defendants' motion for a directed verdict was properly denied.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAAKENSEN v. BURGESS SULPHITE FIBRE CO
(May 6, 1913)