Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

NAPIER et al. v. DILDAY

APPEAL AND ERROR — Review — Consent Judgment. A case having been tried to the court without the intervention of a jury and the finding upon which the judgment was rendered being made by the consent of all parties, the judgment being rendered according to such finding, there is nothing for this court to review, and the proceeding in error will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

WILLIAMS, J.

The record shows that the finding made against the plaintiffs in error, upon which the judgment was rendered, was with the consent of their counsel. Consent ends all contention between the parties, and there is nothing to review on appeal. Baker v. Van Ness et al., 37 Okla. 122, 130 P. 536; Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co., 28 Or. 9, 40 P. 406, 1014, 52 Am. St. Rep. 759, and authorities therein cited.

The proceeding in error is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NAPIER ET AL. v. DILDAY
(Jun 10, 1913)