Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GASKIN v. CLEVELAND WOOLEN MILLS

APPEAL AND ERROR — Time for Taking Proceedings — Dismissal. Under chapter 18, p. 35, Sess. Laws 1910-11, proceedings in error in the Supreme Court must be brought within six months from the date of the rendition of the judgment or order from which the appeal is sought to be taken, and, when not so brought, this court is without jurisdiction, and the same will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

DUNN, J.

This case presents error from the county court of Jefferson county. April 30, 1912, the motion for a new trial was denied, from which order the defendant on February 27, 1913, began proceedings in error in this court by filing his petition in error with case-made attached. April 30, 1913, counsel for plaintiff filed motion to dismiss because the proceeding in error was not begun in this court within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of. In view of the provisions of chapter 18, p. 35, Sess. Laws 1910-11, wherein it is provided that all proceedings for reversing, vacating, or modifying judgments or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of, the motion must be sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GASKIN v. CLEVELAND WOOLEN MILLS
(May 27, 1913)