Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

W.H. POTTER v. THE STATE.

Occupation — Intoxicating Liquors — Local Option — Suspended Sentence.

The trial court is not authorized to suspend the sentence except when the jury so find and recommend. Following Roberts v. State, 70 Tex.Crim. Rep., recently decided.

DAVIDSON, PRESIDING JUDGE.

This record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The question involved in the suspended sentence law was submitted to the jury. They failed or refused to recommend suspension of the sentence. It is claimed that the court should have, despite the failure of the jury to so find, exercised the power of suspending the sentence. Under the authority of Roberts v. State, 70 Tex.Crim. Rep., decided at the present term of court, there was no error in this proceeding. The court is not authorized to suspend the sentence, except when the jury so find and recommend.

This judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

[Rehearing denied October 15, 1913. — Reporter.]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POTTER v. THE STATE
(Jun 27, 1913)