Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CLINTON O. W. RY. CO. v. KANSAS CITY, M. O. RY. CO.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Abandonment of Appeal — Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error does not file brief within time allowed by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), nor before case is due to be taken on submission, the appeal will be treated as abandoned and dismissed.

(Syllabus by Thacker, C.)

Opinion by THACKER, C.

On July 19, 1911, the case-made was filed in this court, and on June 10, 1913, this case was due to be taken on submission; but the plaintiff in error has wholly failed to file briefs as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) and has thus abandoned the appeal. See Hill v. Riddle, 36 Okla. 122, 128 P. 112; Hukill v. Tharp, 36 Okla. 178, 128 P. 115; Ledbetter v. Kimsey, post, 128 P. 1086; Green v. State, ex rel. Caldwell, 36 Okla. 287, 128 P. 257.

We are therefore of the opinion the appeal should be treated as abandoned and dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CLINTON O. W. RY. CO. v. KANSAS CITY, M. O. RY
(Aug 12, 1913)