Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JORDON v. ST. LOUIS S. F. R. CO.

Opinion by BREWER, C.

This appeal is prosecuted by case-made. A motion for new trial was filed on December 12, 1910. The record fails to show when this motion was acted upon. The case-made was served on opposing counsel April 19, 1911. The record is not certified as a transcript.

The record before us failing to affirmatively show that the case-made was served within three days after final judgment, or within an extension of time properly allowed by the court, the same is a nullity and presents nothing for this court to review. The cause is dismissed. Com'rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173, 92 P. 152; Bettis v. Cargile, 23 Okla. 301, 100 P. 436; Lankford v. Wallace, 26 Okla. 857, 110 P. 672; Carr v. Thompson, 27 Okla. 7, 110 P. 667; Lathim v. Schlack, 27 Okla. 522, 112 P. 968; Willson v. Willson, 27 Okla. 419, 112 P. 970; McCoy v. McCoy, 27 Okla. 371, 112 P. 1040; School District v. Cox, 27 Okla. 459, 112 P. 1041; First Nat. Bank v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank, 29 Okla. 411, 118 P. 574; Bettis v. Cargile, 34 Okla. 319, 126 P. 222.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JORDON v. ST. LOUIS S. F. R. CO
(Oct 14, 1913)