MUCKENFUSS v. RAILWAY COMPANY

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

8779

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Sanders DePass and B.L. Abney, for the appellant, cite: Discretion must be governed by rule: 47 S.C. 498; 15 S.C. 328; 60 S.C. 140; 68 S.C. 37; 94 S.C. 17. Messrs. John T. Seibels and Stanyarne Wilson, for respondents, cite: Motion properly refused: 79 S.C. 469; 81 S.C. 355; 65 S.C. 224; 66 S.C. 17; 91 S.C. 424.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

8779

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Sanders DePass and B.L. Abney, for the appellant, cite: Discretion must be governed by rule: 47 S.C. 498; 15 S.C. 328; 60 S.C. 140; 68 S.C. 37; 94 S.C. 17. Messrs. John T. Seibels and Stanyarne Wilson, for respondents, cite: Motion properly refused: 79 S.C. 469; 81 S.C. 355; 65 S.C. 224; 66 S.C. 17; 91 S.C. 424.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

MUCKENFUSS ET AL. v. ATLANTA C.A.L. RY. CO.

April 2, 1914. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY.Page 50

This appeal is from an order of the Circuit Judge refusing a motion to require the complaint to be made more definite and certain in the particulars mentioned in the notice of motion.

The authorities cited in the brief of the respondents' attorneys fully sustain the ruling of the Circuit Court.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

MUCKENFUSS ET AL. v. ATLANTA C.A.L. RY. CO.

Comments