SCOTT, J.:
This action was tried with that of Aida Cohn, who was plaintiff's wife.
For the reason stated in the case of said Aida Cohn against the same defendant, this judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.
INGRAHAM, P.J., CLARKE and HOTCHKISS, JJ., concurred; McLAUGHLIN, J., dissented.
McLAUGHLIN, J. (dissenting):
This action was brought to recover damages for loss of services of plaintiff's wife. It was tried with her action to recover damages for her injuries. Plaintiff had a recovery of $1,000.
For the reason stated by me in the opinion in Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co. ( 162 App. Div. 791), decided herewith, I think this judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial granted.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.