Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BUDDIE SMITH v. THE STATE.

1. — Murder — Indictment — Citizen.

In the absence of any testimony in the record on appeal, a complaint that one of the members of the grand jury who returned the indictment was not a citizen of the county of the prosecution, can not be reviewed, the trial court finding against such contention.

2. — Same — Announcement — Surprise — Bill of Exceptions.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions to the action of the trial court refusing defendant to withdraw his announcement, etc., on the ground of surprise, the same can not be reviewed.

HARPER, JUDGE.

Appellant was convicted of murder and his punishment assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for life.

No bills of exception and no evidence accompany the record. Appellant filed a motion to abate the indictment, on the ground that one member of the grand jury returning the indictment was not a citizen of DeWitt County, and, therefore, a person unauthorized by law was present when the indictment was being considered and voted on. A contest of this issue was filed by the district attorney; evidence was heard by the court, and he finds that R.J. Poth was a citizen of DeWitt County when he was empaneled and during the time he served on the grand jury. In the absence of any testimony we can not review this finding of the court.

Appellant during the trial, alleging surprise, asked leave to withdraw his announcement of ready for trial, and permission to move to continue the case. The court overruled the application. No exception was reserved to the action of the court, and it may be that the attendance of the witness whom appellant named was secured at the trial. At least, in the absence of a bill of exceptions to the action of the court we can not review the question.

No evidence accompanying the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. THE STATE
(Jun 3, 1914)