Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LOOMER, Commissioner of Finance and Accounts, et al., v. SCOTT

APPEAL AND ERROR — Moot Questions — Dismissal. Abstract or hypothetical cases, disconnected from the granting of actual relief, or from the determination of which no particular result can follow other than the awarding of the costs of the appeal, will not be decided by this court.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

KANE, C. J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss the proceeding in error, in support of which there is an uncontradicted affidavit to the effect that the appeal in this cause now involves only moot questions of law, the determination of which can have no practical results. This is sufficient ground for sustaining the motion to dismiss. Bryan v. Sullivan, 29 Okla. 686, 119 P. 124; McCullough et al. v. Gilcrease, 40 Okla. 741, 141 P. 5.

The motion to dismiss is therefore sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LOOMER v. SCOTT
(Jun 16, 1914)