Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN A. DE LEYER, Respondent, v. J. GABRIEL BRITT et al., as Commissioners of Election of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Per Curiam.

The parties to a question in difference may submit it to the court pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure if it might be the subject of an action. A mandamus proceeding is not an action, and the Appellate Division, therefore, did not have jurisdiction to direct the issuance of a peremptory writ upon the submission of a controversy pursuant to said section. However, this court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. We have examined the question involved because of its public importance and have reached the conclusion that the order should be reversed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of INGRAHAM, P.J., below, and because the Appellate Division did not have jurisdiction to make it.

WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., WERNER, HISCOCK, COLLIN, HOGAN, MILLER and CARDOZO, JJ., concur.

Order reversed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DE LEYER v. BRITT
(Jul 14, 1914)