Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. H. D. SUHR, Appellant.

THE COURT. —

It was stipulated that Crim. No. 253, People v. Ford, and Crim. No. 254, People v. Suhr, should be tried together and that the appeals in both cases should be heard on the record brought up in Crim. No. 253, People v. Ford. The law and the facts in both cases have been fully considered in People v. Ford, ante, p. 388, [ 143 P. 1075], this day decided.

Upon the authority of that case and for the reasons therein given,

The judgment and order are affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on November 9, 1914.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SUHR
(Sep 10, 1914)