Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

J.B. THETFORD ET AL. v. THE STATE.

1. — Judgment Nisi — Civil Docket — Procedure.

Where a judgment final on a forfeiture of bail bond is rendered, the statute provides that such cases shall be placed on the civil docket, and the proceedings shall be governed by the same rule governing other civil actions.

2. — Same — Brief — Practice on Appeal.

In an appeal from a judgment final on a judgment nisi, the law requires that appellant must file a brief in the lower court and in this court as in civil actions, and, where this is not done, the appeal will be dismissed upon motion of the State. Following Conrad v. State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 674, and other cases.

PRENDERGAST, PRESIDING JUDGE.

These three cases are by the same appellants and present exactly the same question. The judgment appealed from in each case is a final judgment on a forfeited bail bond.

Our statute expressly provides that such cases shall be placed on the civil docket and the proceedings shall be governed by the same rules governing other civil actions.

Our law requires an appellant in such case to file a brief in the lower court and this court as in civil actions. No brief is filed in this case and there is no indication that one has ever been filed in the lower court. Therefore, upon the motion of the Assistant Attorney General each of said cases is hereby ordered dismissed. Lewis v. State, 38 S.W. Rep., 205; Sparks v. State, 47 S.W. Rep., 976; Mack v. State, 57 S.W. Rep., 811; Bringhurst v. State, 37 S.W. Rep., 757; Conrad v. State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 674. It is needless to cite other authorities.

Dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THETFORD v. THE STATE
(Oct 14, 1914)