AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

COLUSA AND HAMILTON RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent, v. CHARLES H. GLENN et al., Appellants.

THE COURT. —

This is an appeal from the judgment taken by plaintiff. As we have this day affirmed the order granting the motion for a new trial (Civ. No. 1210), ante, p. 634, [ 144 P. 993], and the effect of that order was to vacate the judgment, it is unnecessary to make any formal disposition of this appeal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COLUSA AND HAMILTON RAILROAD CO. v. GLENN
(Oct 27, 1914)