AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL STRAUSS, Appellant.

RICH, J.:

This appeal is from an order of the County Court of Nassau county denying defendant's motion for leave to inspect the minutes of the grand jury for the purpose of making a motion to dismiss such indictment upon the ground that the facts before that body were not sufficient to warrant the findings of the indictment. The indictment is for seduction under promise of marriage; it was found on October 24, 1913. The defendant was arraigned on the twenty-ninth of that month, and after pleading not guilty was released, pending trial, on bail.

The motion was properly denied on the ground of laches, and the order must be affirmed, but there is another reason for the affirmance. The motion was addressed to the sound discretion of the court, the order is not appealable, and we are, therefore, without power to review it. ( Matter of Montgomery, 126 App. Div. 72; People v. Wendel, 128 id. 437, 438; People v. Zerillo, 140 id. 902.)

The order of the County Court of Nassau county must be affirmed.

JENKS, P.J., BURR, THOMAS and PUTNAM, JJ., concurred.

Order of the County Court of Nassau county affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. STRAUSS
(Dec 18, 1914)