Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TYLER v. TYLER

APPEAL AND ERROR — Ruling on Demurrer to Evidence — Reservation for Review — Motion for New Trial — Necessity. The ruling on a demurrer to the evidence is a decision occurring on the trial; and, in order to enable the Supreme Court to review such ruling, it is necessary that a motion for a new trial be filed within the time prescribed by law.

(Syllabus by Thacker, C.)

Opinion by THACKER, C.

This cause is brought here for the purpose of reversing a judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the evidence. The case-made filed herein fails to show any motion for new trial was filed. The appeal, therefore, under authority of Insurance Company of North America v. Little, 34 Okla. 499, 125 P. 1098; Ardmore Oil Milling Co. v. Doggett Grain Co., 32 Okla. 280, 122 P. 241; Stump v. Porter, 31 Okla. 157, 120 P. 639, and James v. Jackson, 30 Okla. 190, 120 P. 288, should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TYLER v. TYLER
(Dec 8, 1914)