AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE BANKING BOARD et al. v. OKLAHOMA BANKERS' TRUST CO.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

States — "Suit Against the State" — Consent.

A suit to mandamus the state banking board is a "suit against the state."

PER CURIAM.

This is an action in mandamus to compel the banking board of the state of Oklahoma to pay to the Oklahoma Bankers' Trust Company $10.266.67, the amount of its deposit in the Alamo State Bank of Muskogee, Okla., at the time of its failure. The suit was filed in the district court of Oklahoma County on the 19th day of February, 1912, and the alternative writ of mandamus was issued on the same date.

After answer to the alternative writ, there was trial, and judgment making the writ peremptory, and defendant, the banking board, brings the case here. For the reason that this is a suit against the state, the trial court was wrong in letting the writ go. This case is governed by J. D. Lankford et al., Composing the State Banking Board, etc., v. Platte Iron Works Co., 225 U.S. 461, 35 Sup. Ct. 173, 59 L.Ed. 316. See, also, State ex rel. Taylor v. Cockrell, 27 Okla. 630, 112 P. 1000; Chas. W. Lovett et al. v. J. D. Lankford et al., 47 Okla. 12, 145 P. 767.

Reversed and dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE BANKING BOARD v. OKLAHOMA BANKERS' TRUST CO
(Feb 16, 1915)