Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SHIPMAN et al. v. PORTER

LIABILITY ON NOTE — Pleadings — Judgment. Syllabus same as in the case of Robert Shipman et al. v. H. P. Porter, ante, 149 P. 901.

(Syllabus by Collier, C.)

Opinion by COLLIER, C.

This action was begun in the district court of Tulsa county by H. P. Porter, defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, against Robert Shipman and David Shipman, plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, to recover upon a promissory note.

The parties, pleadings, rulings, and errors assigned in this case are the same, except as to the time of maturity of the promissory note sued upon, as in the case of Robert Shipman et al. v. H. P. Porter, ante, 149 P. 901.

Upon the authorities cited in said case, this cause should be reversed and remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHIPMAN ET AL. v. PORTER
(May 11, 1915)