AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

ADAM FRANK, Respondent, v. ROWLAND SHAFTO, INC., and CHARLES F.H. JOHNSON, Appellants.

PER CURIAM:

The defendant having failed to appeal from the interlocutory judgment before the entry of final judgment, and the interlocutory judgment having been merged in the final judgment, the only appeal which could then be taken was from the final judgment. The defendant then had the right to review the interlocutory judgment on appeal from the final judgment by inserting in his notice of appeal a statement that he wished to review the interlocutory judgment. ( Bates v. Holbrook, 89 App. Div. 548.) As this appeal is from the interlocutory judgment taken after the entry of final judgment, such appeal is not authorized and it must, therefore, be dismissed, with ten dollars costs.

PER CURIAM:

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FRANK v. ROWLAND SHAFTO, INC
(Jun 1, 1915)