Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DUNLAP v. NORTON

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error does not file brief within the time allowed by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), nor before case is due to be taken on submission, the appeal will be treated as abandoned, and dismissed.

(Syllabus by Thacker, C.)

Opinion by THACKER, C.

On October 31, 1912, the case-made was filed in this court, on July 13, 1915, this case was due to be taken on submission, but the plaintiff in error has wholly failed to file briefs, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), and has thus abandoned the appeal.

We are, therefore, of the opinion that the case should be treated as abandoned and dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DUNLAP v. NORTON
(Jul 20, 1915)